Wednesday, March 25, 2009

The Richmond Democrat: Now endorsed by The Richmond Times Dispatch!

The Richmond Democrat is great at bare-knuckle politics. --Bart Hinkle, Richmond Times Dispatch
Hear that Virginia Democratic Politicians? I am available at very reasonable rates. I can bring that special "bare-knuckle" edge to your next political campaign.

But in all seriousness, Mr. Hinkle's praise of my blog is--like all positive comments about Democrats in the RTD--left-handed and merely a preface to criticism. Like many others on the Republican side of the ledger, Mr. Hinkle took issue with my post about Representative Michele Bachmann's call for her supporters to become "armed and dangerous."
The Richmond Democrat is great at bare-knuckle politics. But sometimes even a good boxer swings wild. This post does so, and in so doing, inadvertently calls attention to a lamentable trend in America: the death of metaphor.

Satire already is just about kaput. It’s so just about kaput, anytime the newspaper prints a piece of satire, we slap an overline above the headline reading, “SATIRE” to clue readers in. Even so, a few readers who have read the item as literal reporting inevitably call up, infuriated or confused or both. It’s a minor miracle that The Onion has managed to do so well.

RD’s post, “Republican Member of Congress Commits Sedition,“ might be a very clever satire of overheated partisan rhetoric. I’d like to believe that. But I don’t think it’s meant in jest.
I enjoy a little back and forth with Bart Hinkle from time to time. We discover all kinds of things inadvertently: I've apparently stumbled onto the death of metaphor, while Mr. Hinkle has accidentally called attention to the Republican art of double talk: a kind of doublespeak or dog whistle politics.  Maybe the RTD should hire me to do some point-counterpoint with Mr. Hinkle: maybe we'll stumble onto a cure for cancer.

But back to my point about doublespeak or dog whistle politics. Republicans like Michele Bachmann, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and Michael Savage exploit these rhetorical devices to encourage political violence in our country while escaping legal--and at least in conservative circles--moral responsibility for the tragedies they cause. The list of their victims is not short: the Knoxville church shootings, the assassination of the Arkansas State Democratic Chairman Bill Gwatney, and the ongoing pattern of threats against Democratic politicians.  Whenever someone is murdered by the "fans" of these Republican "leaders," they are quick to say "I was joking," or "I was just using a metaphor!"

In Mr. Hinkle's world, when Ann Coulter calls for the bombing of the New York Times it's just satire. In my world, when Timothy McVeigh blew up the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City it was mass murder and domestic terrorism. It's no mystery what motivated McVeigh, and right-wing radio hosts use McVeigh's list of grievances as crib notes for their hate speech. Writers like Coulter, radio hosts like Savage, and politicians like Bachmann are well aware of the fact that they are speaking to a mixed audience that consists of people who understand concepts like "metaphor" and people who take their exhortations to violence quite literally. They count on people like Mr. Hinkle to make excuses for them when someone acts on their violent rhetoric.

I've written quite a bit about the growing problem of Republican inspired terrorism against liberals and Democrats. Mr. Hinkle can try and pretend it doesn't exist, but it does.

3 comments:

Star Womanspirit said...

I know we may disagree on some topics (such as the middle east situation) but your blog is great and you do call things like you see them....(I usually agree with your assessments)

You are right on with this!! If anyone had used these "metaphors" when the Bush administration was in office the outrage from the outrageous right would have been deafening. I can hear their screams of Traitors and Off With their Heads.....

You are good for VA!! Unfortunately, in this instance, the same cannot be said of the Richmond Dispatch. Maybe the Richmond Dispatch should take a hard look at what their writers are espousing.....

So those of us over at Mosquito Blog send you a Buzz....Buzz....

ToolUser said...

So when some wacked-out nutbag commits a cowardly and despicable act of domestic terrorism - be it Timothy McVeigh, Bill Ayers, The Unabomber or the Weathermen/Weather Underground, it's the fault of right-wing pundits and talk radio?

And Michael Savage is to blame for McVeigh's attack on the Murrah Federal Building?

How about we place blame with the actor who in fact actually committed the act?

People should be free to speak their minds - if a person acts on impulses - even those that might be aligned with something another person said - the fault lies with the actor alone, unless the person issuing the utterances held some special power or control over the actor. Some jerk talk show host might say "Go out and kill your neighbors!" but he or she should not be prosecuted if some nitwit goes out and actually does it.

Or are we going to blame Rush Limbaugh for the lowly deeds of Bill Ayers, the Weathermen and Charles Whitman?

In any case, I'd bet you make some good points in your blog now and then - I don't know because I just discovered it - but you're way off base here.

Ooh, ooh! I know!! We need to reinstate the "Fairness Doctrine" to stop those awful talking heads from forcing the weak-willed to carry out their evil and nefarious deeds!

Dutchman6 said...

I see now that it is a waste of time to engage you in reasoned debate, or even to expect you to move beyond pontificating about that which you know nothing to gather information.

To quote Dorothy Thompson, "You can lead a horticulture, but you can't make her think."

You are what you are -- a collectivist political hack, obsessed with a party dialectic that lies in ruins, tilting at straw men of your own device, oblivious of facts. The GOP (I refuse to call them "Republican") and the Democrat parties are two wings of the same bird of prey, as Pat Buchanan said (and though I agree with little else about his other ideas, I agree with him there). You act as if any of the inter-party jockeying for power MEANS anything anymore. Events are about engulf it all.

You have no knowledge of those you denounce, imputing wrongly connections and alliances that do not exist, and eliding any differences that are obvious on their face simply to fit your world-view.

I am disappointed but not surprised.

But here's the thing I've always wondered:

When did so-called "liberals" become sychophants of the FBI, and fans of utilizing the power of the state to enforce political compliance in contravention of conscience? This is not liberalism. It is collectivism of the worst sort.

Just because you control the regime now does not mean it cannot turn on you and devour you.

The Founders understood this, especially those who lived long enough to survive the crisis posed by the Alien and Sedition Acts. Never pass a law that you wouldn't be willing to see your own worst political enemy enforce upon you.

You know, from our point of view, Bush was the best Democrat president the Republicans ever elected. We despised him. And somehow, in your party-obsession-beclouded brain, you can impute any sort of connection between the GOP and us? It must be nice to be so haplessly, willfully, clueless.

Brecht wrote, "He who laughs has not yet been told the terrible news." The other day, a friend of mine said, "Brecht was an optimist." I'm afraid he's right.

And when your universe collapses under the weight of its own misconceptions, try not to get crushed by the falling reality. And take a moment, when you can, to remember the "violent paranoid right-wing militia nutbag" who tried to warn you of the consequences of your ignorance.

-- Mike Vanderboegh